Awards and Citations
There are many wine writers and wine
competitions throughout the world, all attempting to rate wines by scores
out of 10, 20 or 100, or by awarding medals or stars. We have included some
of their ratings (where known) as guidelines only. So, if you enjoy a wine
given a high mark by Robert Parker, for example, his assessments of other
wines may lead you to other previously untried delights. We should stress,
however, that scores and awards reveal nothing about the wine's style and
character - at most they are mere indications of its general quality. The
descriptions which accompany the scores are far more helpful and, in the
end, the best palate for deciding which wines you enjoy most is your own!
So what do we think of them? Gold
medals and high scores can be used cynically to sell wines. However, it is not
enough to see that such an award has been made without knowing on what basis it
was given. We prefer to consider the opinions of individuals such as Parker
rather than panels, particularly when the panel changes with every tasting (as
in most of the magazines). As indicated above, however, we do not give too much
weight to anyone else's scores, preferring to trust our own judgment.
Important: a wine which does
not have a critic's rating is not necessarily inferior. It may mean either that
the critics have not tasted it or that we have not seen the review. We
only purchase wines which we consider to offer excellent value for their
quality, regardless of reviews so you can be assured that any wines purchased from
us will be well received.
Decanter
One of the UK's leading monthly wine magazines. In addition to numerous
wine-related articles by some of the UK's top wine writers, each month it holds
panel tastings (different panels for every tasting, suggesting a probable lack of
continuity) of two distinct styles of wines, awarding one to five stars, deeming
the wines to be:
| * |
Acceptable |
| ** |
Quite good |
| *** |
Recommended |
| **** |
Highly
recommended |
| ***** |
Award winners |
Gambero Rosso
The
guide to Italian Wines is an annual publication reviewing over 15,000 wines (a
further 10,000 wines were rejected) from over 2,000 producers awarding them one,
two or the extremely coveted three glasses. Wines are tasted blind by exert
tasters before being awarded their stars then around 1500 wines go forward into
the Three Glasses taste-offs. In 2006, 246 wines wines were awarded tre
bicchieri - ie. around 1% of all wines entered. Profiles of both the
wineries and their wines are offered, arranged by region. Contact details are
also provided so it can be a useful tool for the enthusiastic wine traveller as
well as for professionals.
Le Guide Hachette des Vins
An annual publication which reviews around
10,000 French and Swiss, Luxembourg and, now, Canadian wines
by appellation (having rejected 22,000 more wines which didn't make the grade).
Independent and highly respected (regarded as the French wine drinker's bible),
it examines every appellation (by region) and rates wines by awarding stars (see
below). It is an extremely good way of discovering wines from smaller growers
who don't get reviewed by Robert Parker, the Wine Spectator and other
publications which all too often focus on the more prestigious estates and their
wines.
| No
star |
Recommended |
| * |
Excellent |
| ** |
Remarkable |
| *** |
Exceptional |
In addition, the very best one or
two wines from an appellation may be awarded the 'Coup
de Coeur', the very highest recommendation.
Bettane & Desseauve - Le
Classement (Revue
du Vin de France)
Le Classement is the annual publication of Michel Bettane and Thierry
Dessauve of the highly respected French wine magazine La Revue du vin de
France. It assesses the wines from top estates, giving up to three stars for
the estate and marks out of ten for the wines. It is an extremely
reliable guide. RVF is a monthly magazine which awards up to five stars (the
French Decanter perhaps?)
Wine & Spirit Magazine
Another leading monthly UK magazine dedicated to its subject. Like
Decanter, it offers a range of articles and reviews of three tastings, one of
which looks at wines to drink with particular foods. Wines are marked on a
100-point scale, with no wine receiving less than 50 points. In this respect it
is similar to the Parker system, one important difference being that the results
are arrived at by a panel (individual critics' reviews can be far more reliable
than an average of several tasters - if you agree with the critic). Apoint to
note: W&S has undergone several changes in recent years including having
rebranded itself from "Wine" to "Wine International" before settling on its
current name and more trendy image - not one for the purists!
Robert Parker - The Wine Advocate
Robert M. Parker Jnr is America's foremost wine critic and a world-renowned
authority on the wines of Bordeaux and the Rhône Valley. He publishes a
bi-monthly guide, The Wine Advocate (see
erobertparker.com),
in which he rates wines out of 100, employing a somewhat controversial system
(in reality it is a 51-point scale as all wines automatically receive 50 points
- don't ask why. In fact most other point-based systems work this way - it is
extremely rare to find a critic awarding a wine less than 10 points out of 20).
Points are awarded as follows:
| 5
points |
Colour
and appearance |
| 15
points |
Nose |
| 20
points |
Palate
and finish |
| 10
points |
Overall
quality and future potential |
It is fairly obvious then that a
wine scoring 75 points is a very average one, which to Parker means a soundly
made but straightforward wine with little distinction whereas 85 points means
the wine is very good with character, flavour and finesse. A 90-point wine shows
exceptional character and complexity, whilst 96 to 100 points are rarely
awarded.
Parker is particularly strong on
wines from the Rhône Valley and Bordeaux and, on the whole, any wine from these
regions scoring 90 points or more will be fabulous. In recent years he has
recruited Pierre-Antione Rovani and Daniel Thomases as specialists in Burgundy
and Italy respectively.
Parker's system is the subject of
much debate; however, he points out that "scores do not reveal the
important facts about wine. The written commentary that accompanies the
ratings is a better source of information regarding the wine's style and
personality, its relative quality level vis-à-vis its peers, and its value and
ageing potential than any score could ever indicate". He concludes "there
can never be any substitute for your own palate nor any better education than
tasting the wine yourself".
Note: Robert M. Parker and
eRobertParker.com own the copyright for all reviews credited to "Parker"
Jancis Robinson MW is the one of the UK's foremost critics, reckoned to have a superb palate.
Recent years have seen emerge a clear difference between the American palate (as
defined by Robert Parker) and the European palate of which Jancis is one of the
finest examples. That is not to say the two palates do not coincide often. A
truly fine wine, representative of its origins etc generally finds itself praise
on both sides of the Atlantic. As well as writing in the Financial Times every
Saturday, Jancis has her own web-site (see
http://www.jancisrobinson.com/)
with subsciption-based "Purple Pages" containing the really important stuff. For
number crunchers, Jancis awards wines points out of 20.
Stephen Tanzer's International Wine Cellar
is, perhaps, the new Wine Advocate. Established in 1985, it is a
subscription-based bi-monthly publication available both on-line and in paper formats (or both - each package is priced accordingly). As
with Parker, scores are out of 100 with wines scoring over 90 points
coming highly recommended (and 85+ recommended). Wines are recommended as
follows:
|
Under 70 |
Avoid |
|
70-74 |
Below
Average |
|
75-79 |
Average |
|
80-84 |
Good |
|
85-89 |
Very
Good to Excellent |
|
90-94 |
Outstanding |
|
95-100 |
Extraordinary |
Wine Spectator
Along with Parker's Wine Advocate, Wine Spectator is America's foremost
wine magazine. It has more in common with the UK's Decanter and Wine magazines
as it features articles and profiles but, perhaps given its homeland, has more
influence on the world of wine than virtually any publication other than the
Wine Advocate. It also scores wines out of 100 and categorizes the scores as
follows:
| 50-59 |
Poor |
| 60-69 |
Below
average |
| 70-79 |
Average |
| 80-89 |
Good to
very good |
| 90-94 |
Outstanding |
| 95-100 |
Classic |
Wine Competitions
The International Wine Challenge is an annual wine competition
organised by Wine & Spirit magazine (see above). Huge numbers of tasters from both the
wine trade and the general public assess thousands of wines from all over the
world. Each year the results are published in the October and November issues of
the magazine with two-thirds of the 7,500 wines reviewed receiving the basic
accolade of "Seal of Approval". Thereafter, wines are awarded Bronze, Silver and
Gold medals with Trophies for the best wines in the category. Whilst this is an
admirable effort, we feel that the results of such a massive competition can
never say much about any of the wines involved: too many tasters with a wide
variety of palates take part and in recent years the better producers and
merchants are not bothering to submit their wines. The same can broadly be said
for the Decanter World Wine Awards although for some reason this
competition does seem to attract some better wines. The problem is that with entry charges of around
£80 per wine (plus samples) small-scale importers simply cannot afford these
competitions. This means that unless the better wines from each category are
entered, the results are simply meaningless.
Mâcon and Paris are
two of France's most prestigious wine competitions, both awarding medals (gold,
silver, bronze). More localised than the IWC, they are generally more reliable insofar as any
wine with a medal will have good qualities. Other regional competitions that can
be relied on include Brussels and Vienna. However, wines which do not have
medals from such competitions are not necessarily poor (the big names often do not
enter such competitions, for example).